Optical spectroscopic nano-imaging

Techniques: Optical Spectroscopy Goes Intramolecular

Optical spectroscopic nano-imaging

Figure 1 | Optical spectroscopic nano-imaging. Zhang and colleagues1 have resolved the internal structure of a single molecule on the surface of a substrate by optical spectroscopy. They hold a metallic tip that has a very sharp apex (a few nanometres across) in close proximity to the molecule, and monitor the electric current (not shown) arising from electrons tunnelling between the tip and the sample. Laser light is then focused on the apex. Detection of the resulting tip-scattered photons provides a vibrational spectroscopic signature of the molecular structure.

SHARE:





June 06, 2013

Optical spectroscopic imaging has taken a leap into the intramolecular regime with an approach that achieves subnanometre spatial resolution. The technique should find applications in photochemistry and nanotechnology.

The goal of optical microscopy is to visu­alize the physical and chemical proper­ties of objects too small to be seen with the naked eye. However, objects separated by less than approximately half the wavelength of the light that is used to illuminate them can in general not be distinguished, owing to the inherent wave nature of light. The devel­opment of near-field optics has broken this spatial-resolution limit and has enabled opti­cal imaging and spectroscopy with a resolution of a few nanometres. On page 82 of this issue(Jun 6th), Zhang et al.1 report an optical spectroscopic imaging approach that achieves subnanometre resolution and resolves the internal structure of a single molecule.

In 1928, Edward Hutchinson Synge came up with an idea for nano­metre-scale optical microscopy2, possibly inspired by Richard Zsigmondy’s ultra­microscope3. Synge sug­gested that light scattered by a small particle placed close to an object could act as a localized light source. Spatial reso­lution would then be determined by the size of the particle rather than the wavelength of the light used.

The experimental implementation of this idea, however, had to await the invention of scanning tunnel­ling microscopy (STM) in the 1980s, because of the need for precise, nano­metre-scale spatial control of the sam­ple and scatterer. STM, which is based on a quantum tunnelling current of electrons between a nanoscale tip and the sample, provided spatial resolu­tion down to the atomic scale4. This breakthrough was followed by the development of atomic force micro­scopy (AFM). Because AFM does not rely on a tunnelling current, it can be used on a much wider range of samples, including non-conducting materials and soft matter.

Although STM, AFM and other techniques such as transmission electron microscopy and X-ray microscopy can achieve results with atomic resolution, the goal of reaching this ultrahigh resolution, in com­bination with the detailed and sensitive information that optical spectroscopy would provide, remained unachieved. The power of optical spectroscopy lies in its sensitivity to energetic details of the configuration and electronic structure of atoms and molecules in solids, and the way in which these funda­mental properties are coupled. In particular, when probing vibrational motion between atoms, optical spectroscopy can be used to identify the chemical constituents of molecules and solids.

Possible ways of combining STM and AFM with optical techniquesto provide nano­metre-scale spectroscopic information have been extensively explored. The initial approach of near-field scanning optical microscopy (NSOM), which is based on the use of a tapered fibre with an STM or AFM feedback mechanism for controlling the sample–tip dis­tance on the nanometre scale, provided5 spatialresolution to below 100 nm. Other methods that paved the way to higher resolution and greater versatility included scanning plasmon near-field microscopy6 and photonic force microscopy7.These developments led to the technique of scattering scanning near-field optical microscopy (s-SNOM). This generali­zation of NSOM and the early methods pro­vides the most versatile realization of Synge’s vision8. In s-SNOM, the apex of the tip (pref­erably metallic) serves as the nanoscale scat­terer, enabling almost any optical spectroscopy technique to be extended to near-field use for probing electronic and vibrational properties with a spatial resolution of 10 nm or better9,10. (Following the development of near-field microscopy, powerful, super-resolution far-field optical microscopic techniques emerged, but these have typically provided limited spec­troscopic information.)

Meanwhile, STM has been extended to yield vibrational and thus chemical spectroscopic information with atomic resolution using an approach called inelastic tunnelling spectro­scopy11. Although so far limited to operating at cryogenic temperature conditions, this tech­nique set the stage for what is possible in terms of spatial resolution and spectral content.

Zhang et al. extend these previous efforts by combining low-temperature STM (78 kelvin) in an ultrahigh vacuum with Raman spectro­scopy as an optical vibrational spectroscopy technique (Fig. 1). In Raman spectroscopy, incident laserphotons lose energy to specific molecular vibrational excitations in the sample, thus providing chemi­cal ‘fingerprints’. The combination of Raman spectro­scopy with spe­cially designed silver or gold STM tips, which can confine and locally enhance the incident laser field at the apex, is called tip-enhanced Raman scattering (TERS). Using STM and silver tips, Zhang and col­leagues achieved subnanometre spatial resolution and were able to map spectroscopic signatures inside a single molecule, and to determine how these signatures changed with molecular orientation.

Optical spectroscopy with atomic-scale spatial resolution previously seemed impossible, with s-SNOM and TERSthought to be limited by the depth to which light can pen­etrate into the metallic tip— on the order of 10 nm at visible and infrared wavelengths. However, optical fields can be confined to almost arbitrar­ily small regions12, which are limited only by the size at which the electrons in a homogeneous medium cease to behave as free particles. This limit is given by the Thomas–Fermi screening length of about 0.1 nm, below which non-local effects become significant. The fact that scanning near-field optical microscopy techniques have not pre­viously achieved such high spatial resolution is probably due to the AFM and STM instru­ments used for optical techniques not hav­ing been designed with atomic resolution in mind.

The mechanisticdetails underlying the unprecedented optical resolution and molec­ular sensitivity obtained in Zhang and col­leagues’ work is not yet completely clear. The TERS signal measured seems to increase non­linearly with increasing power of the incident laser, in contrast to what is observed with conventional Raman or TERS spectroscopy. The authors attribute this to a higher-order non­linear response generating the signal. More­over, the TERS signal was found to be sensitive to the optical properties of the tip in un­expected ways. The combination of these factors raises questions for theory and calls for further investigation.

The authors’ work opens up avenues for probing and even controlling materials on molecular scales. Because it can be combined with essentially any optical technique, detailed specific chemical and physical information about many kinds of samples can be obtained, with the only limitation being the requirement of STM for an electrically conductingsample. The highly localized laser-field enhancementcan also be used for photochemistry on the nanoscale, making and breaking bonds on the molecular level. Ultimately, this development could lead to new techniques for probing and controlling nanoscale structure, dynamics, mechanics and chemistry.

Source: Nature

Joanna M. Atkin and Markus B. Raschke (Department of Physics, Department of Chemistry, and JILA, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0390, USA.)

1.  Zhang, R. et al. Nature 498, 82–86 (2013).

2.  Synge, E. H. Phil. Mag. 6, 356–362 (1928).

3.  Siedentopf, H. & Zsigmondy, R. Ann. Phys. 315, 1–39 (1902).

4.  Binnig, G., Rohrer, H., Gerber, C. & Weibel, E. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 120–123 (1983).

5.  Pohl, D. W., Denk, W. & Lanz, M. Appl. Phys. Lett. 44, 651–653 (1984).

6.  Specht, M., Pedarnig, J. D., Heckl, W. M. & Hänsch, T. W. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 476–479 (1992).

7.  Florin, E.-L., Pralle, A., Hörber, J. K. H. & Stelzer, E. H. K. J. Struct. Biol. 119, 202–211 (1997).

8.  Atkin, J. M., Berweger, S., Jones, A. C. & Raschke, M. B. Adv. Phys. 61, 745–842 (2012).

9.  Cialla, D. et al. J. Raman Spectrosc. 40, 240–243 (2009).

10.Yano, T., Verma, P., Saito, Y., Ichimura, T. & Kawata, S. Nature Photon. 3, 473–477 (2009).

11.Stipe, B. C., Rezaei, M. A. & Ho, W. Science 280, 1732–1735 (1998).

12.Kreibig, U. & Vollmer, M. Optical Properties of Metal Clusters (Springer, 1995).

Microsoft
Development Category (English)728x90